Comparison of efficiency recombination of nonequilibrium carriers in structures with quantum dots and quantum wells, grown by mocvd
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents the results of comparing the efficiency of recombination of nonequilibrium carriers in the InGaN quantum dots (QDs) and quantum wells (QWs), emitting in the green region of the spectrum. Results of studies using optical temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) showed that the internal quantum efficiency of the InGaN quantum dots at room temperature was 8.7 times greater than that obtained for the InGaN quantum wells, due to better spatial localization of electrically charged particles. The results of measurements of photoluminescence spectra at different levels of laser excitation showed that the effect of polarization-built electric fields on recombination processes of electrically charged particles in Kant points are negligible compared to the quantum wells. The results show that the InGaN quantum dots improve the luminescence efficiency of the LEDs in green and blue spectral bands.
Reference 19, figures 4, tables 1.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
D. Leonard, M. Krinshnamurthy, C.M. Reaves, S.P. Denbaars, P.M. Petroff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (1993) 3203.
F.A. Ponce, D.P. Bour, Nature 386 (1997) 351.
S. Nakamura, Science 281 (1998) 956.
Y.K. Su, S.J. Change, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 49 (2002) 1361.
L.W. Wu, T.C. Wen, IEEE J. Quantum Elec-tron, 38 (2002) 446.
B. Damilano, N. Grandjean, Appl. Phys. Lett., 75 (1999) 3751.
K. Tachibana, T. Someya, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74 (1999) 383.
C. Adelmann, J. Simon, Appl. Phys. Lett., 76 (2000) 1570.
L.W. Ji, Y.K. Su, S.J. Chang, J. Cryst. Growth 249 (2003) 144.
L.W. Ji, T.H. Fang, Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 4218.
I.K. Park, M.K. Kwon, C.Y. Cho, J.Y. Kim, C.H. Cho and S.J. Park, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 253105 (2008).
D.J. Eaglesham and M. Cerullo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1943 (1990).
J.D. Lambkin, L. Considine, S. Walsh, G.M. Connor, C.J. McDonagh and T.J. Glynn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 73 (1994).
W. Stadler, D.M. Hofmann, H.C. Alt, T. Mus-chik, B.K. Meyer, E. Weigel, G. Muller-Vogt, M. Salk, E. Rupp and K. W. Benz, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10619 (1995).
S.H. Park, J.J. Kim and H.M. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45, 582 (2004).
Y.H. Cho, H.S. Kwack, B.J. Kwon, J. Barjon, J. Brault, B. Daudin and L.S. Dang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 251914 (2006).
J. Bai, T. Wang and S. Sakai, Appl. Phys. 88, 4729 (2000).
S. Fafard, R. Leon, D. Leonard, J.L. Merz and P.M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. B 52, 5752 (1995).
Y. Narukawa, Y. Kawakami, S. Fujita and S. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10283 (1997).