Permutation entropy of fetal heart rate with extraction of maternal heartbeats
Main Article Content
Abstract
Development and application of maternal and fetal physiological states identification techniques based on the noninvasive electrical heart activity monitoring is of great clinical importance during pregnancy. In this paper, new possibilities of applying one of nonlinear measures of time series behavior analysis to the fetal heart rates are explored, and permutation entropy (PE) characteristics of fetal rhythmograms are used to get new insight on the fetal heart rhythm parameters. The new technique of fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) extraction is used, based on filtration in wavelet domain and reconstruction of fECG using detalization coefficients. Permutation entropy analysis is applied to obtain PE values and trends for the case of raw fetal rhythmograms and those obtained with excluded maternal heart beats. The assumption about the need to extract maternal heartbeats from initial rhythmogram is proven by the difference in PE values for two cases.
Ref. 11, figs. 11.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Avilov O., Popov A., Kanaikin О. (2013), “Permutation entropy of EEG signals for different sampling rate and time lag combinations”. SPS-2013, 5-7 June. Warsaw. ISBN 978-1-4673-6318-1.
Almagro S., Elena M. M., Bastiaans M. J., Quero J. M. (2006), “A New Mother Wavelet for Fetal Elec-trocardiography to Achieve Optimal Denoising and Compressing Results”. Computers in Cardiology, vоl. 33, pp. 157-160.
Bandt C., Pompe B. (2002), “Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series”. Physical Review Letters,, vol. 88. ISSN 1079-7114.
Cesarelli M., Romano M., Bifulco P. (2009), "Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardioto-cographic foetal monitoring," Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 39, pp. 106-118.
Chudáček V. (2011), “Automatic evaluation of intrapartum fetal heart rate recordings: a comprehensive analysis of useful features,” Physiological Measures,, vol. 32, pp. 1347-1360.
Hoyer D. et al. (2012), “Fetal development assessed by heart rate patterns —Time scales of complex autonomic control,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, pp. 335-341.
Karvounis E. Papaloukas C., Fotiadis D. I., Michalis L. K. (2004), “Fetal Heart Rate Extraction from Composite Maternal ECG Using Complex Continuous Wavelet Transform”. Computers in Cardiology, vоl. 31, pp. 737-740.
Pan, J.; Tompkins, W.J. (1958), “A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Engineering, vol. BME-32, issue 3, pp. 230-236.
Voskresenskyi S. (2004), “Fetal state evaluation: Cardiatocography, Dopplerometry, Biophisical pro-file,” Minsk, “Knizhnyi Dom”, 304 p. (In Russian)
Vrins F., Jutten C., Verleysen M. (2004), “Sensor Array and Electrode Selection for Non-invasive Fetal Electrocardiogram Extraction by Independent Component Analysis”. Independent Component Analy-sis and Blind Signal Separation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3195, pp. 1017―1024.
Xiaoli Li, Gaoxiang Ouyang. (2010), “Estimating coupling direction between neuronal populations with permutation conditional mutual information”. NeuroImage, vol. 52, pp. 497-507.