Formation of quality evaluation criteria for stereoscopic images
Main Article Content
Abstract
Conducted analysis of existing methods suitable for evaluation of stereoscopic images, classification of these methods is presented and discussed experimental paradigm that can be used to measure and calculate as two-dimensional images and video sequences. Application of subjective methods for assessing the quality of stereoscopic images onscreen. A model of visual perception stereoscopic screen images that takes into account both positive and negative factors that affect the perception of stereoscopic images.
Reference 15, figures 3.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Daly S. (1993), [The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity]. Digital Images and Human Vision. New York : MIT Press.
de Ridder H. (1992), [Minkowski-metrics as a combination rule for digital-image-coding impairments]. Proceedings of the SPIE. pp. 1666:16–26.
Engeldrum P. (2000), [Psychometric Scaling]. Winchester : Imcotek Press.
Engeldrum P. (2004), [A theory of image quality: The image quality circle]. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, Vol. 48. pp.447–457.
Eskicioglu A. A., Fisher P. S. (1995), [Image quality measures and their performance]. IEEE Transactions on Communications. Vol. 43., pp.2959–2965.
Freeman J. and Avons S. (2000), [Focus group exploration of presence through advanced broadcast services]. Proceedings of the SPIE. 3959:530–539.
Gonzalez R. C., Woods R. E. (1992), [Digital Image Processing]. Addison-Wesley publishing company, Inc.
IJsselsteijn W., de Ridder H., Hamberg R., Bouwhuis D., and Freeman J. (1998), [Perceived depth and the feeling of presence in 3DTV]. Displays 18:207–214.
IJsselsteijn W., de Ridder H. and Vliegen J. (2000), [Subjective evaluation of stereoscopic images: Effects of camera parameters and display duration]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 10:225–233.
ITU 2000a. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Recommendation BT.500-10.
ITU 2000b. Subjective assessment of stereoscopic television pictures. Recommendation BT.1438.
Janssen T. and Blommaert F. (2000), [Visual metrics: Discriminative power through flexibility]. Perception. 29:965–980.
