On some features of the development of objective methods speech intelligibility measurements
Main Article Content
Abstract
Three objective methods of estimation of speech intelligibility had been confronted: a method of partial signal-noise relations, formant method and modulation method. The possibility of advantages join of formant and modulation methods is prooved.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
V. Didkovsky, M. Didkovskaya, and A. Prodeus, Acoustic examination of speechcommunication channels, Kyiv: Imex-LTD, 2008, p. 420.
A. Gavrilenko, V. Didkovskiy, and A. Prodeus, “Partial signal-to-noise ratios as an alternative criterion for speech intelligibility”, Electronics and Communications, no. 4, pp. 48–53, 2006.
V. Didkovsky and S. Lunyova, Fundamentals of architectural and physiological acoustics, Kyiv, 2001, p. 422.
K. Jacob, “Correlation of Speech Intelligibility Tests in Reverberant Rooms with Tree Predictive Algorithmes”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1019–1030, 1989.
T. Houtgast and H. Steeneken, “Evaluation of Speech Transmission Channels by using Artificial Signals”, Acustica, vol. 25, pp. 355–367, 1971.
H. J. M. Steeneken and T. Houtgast, “A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 318–326, Jan. 1980. DOI:10.1121/1.384464
L. Gutkin, Theory of optimal methodsradio reception with fluctuating interference, Moscow: Soviet Radio, 1972, p. 448.
D. Vatolyn, A. Ratushnyak, M. Smirnov, and V. Yutkin, Moscow: Dialogue-MYTHS, 2002, p. 381.
N. Pokrovsky, Calculation and measurement of speech intelligibility, Moscow: Svyazizdat, 1962, p. 390.
M. Sapozhkov, Speech signal in cybernetics and communications, Moscow: Svyazizdat, 1963, p. 472.
Y. Bykov, Theory of speech intelligibility and increasing the efficiency of radiotelephone communication, Moscow: Gosenergoizdat, 1959, p. 350.
Y. Kalintsev, Speech intelligibility in digital vocoders, Moscow: Radio and communication, 1991, p. 219.
A. Gavrilenko, V. Didkovskiy, and A. Prodeus, “Comparative analysis of some methodsof speech intelligibility assessment”, in Collected papersof the Acoustic Symposium "Consonance-2007", Kyiv, 2007, pp. 273–278.
A. Gavrilenko, V. Didkovskiy, and A. Prodeus, “Comparison of versions of the formant methodof speech intelligibility assessment”, Electronicsand communications, no. 1, pp. 227–231, 2008.
A. Gavrilenko, V. Didkovsky, A. Prodeus, and N. Samoylenko, “Formant method for assessing speech intelligibility”, Electronics and Communications, no. 5, pp. 63–70, 2007.
Y. Rashevsky and V. Kargashin, “Review of foreign methods for determining speech intelligibility”, Special equipment, no. 2002. http://www.detektor.ru/publication/d2003_1.htm
V. Zheleznyak, Y. Makarov, and A. Khorev, “Some methodological approaches to assessingthe effectiveness of speech information protection”, Special equipment, no. 4, pp. 39–45, 2000.
Y. Makarov and A. Khorev, “On the assessment of the effectiveness of protection of acoustic (speech)information”, Special equipment, no. 5, pp. 46–56, 2000.
A. Prodeus, “On the measurements of probabilistic characteristics of formants of Ukrainian and Russian speech”, Proceedings of the Acoustic Symposium "Consonance-2009", pp. 285–291, 2009.
V. Didkovskiy and A. Prodeus, “Comparison of formant properties of Ukrainian and Russian speech”, Electronics and Nanotechnology, no. 4-5, pp. 88–94, 2009.
